Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Very Friendly Neighbors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Very Friendly Neighbors

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a film, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFILM. As always, films are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because they have IMDb pages, or even just because the director has a biographical article -- rather, they need to show some evidence of significance, such as noteworthy film awards and/or a WP:GNG-worthy volume of critical attention from professional film critics. But this literally just states that the film exists, the end, and its existence is "referenced" to a Blogspot blog rather than a reliable or notability-building source -- and even on a Newspapers.com search for coverage in its own time, all I got was one published review (a start, but not enough all by itself) and one 28-word blurb announcing a screening (not substantive or notability-building at all), which means there simply isn't enough proper coverage here. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found the same review, added it, then found nothing else out there. There's really not much else to suggest notability and honestly, I don't even think that a redirect is needed. There's honestly not much of anything out there about this film. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:22, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.